Açıklama
Did Austin Beaulier's own opposition brief make his weak-ass lawsuit even weaker?
That's exactly what Meta argues in its latest reply brief—and that means this filing could become one of the most damaging responses we've seen in the AI copyright litigation.
Instead of simply arguing that the complaint is legally insufficient, Meta repeatedly points to Beaulier's own allegations and shows they defeat his claims. Even worse, Meta argues that the opposition brief doesn't fix those problems—it actually highlights them.
What we find is, Beaulier screwed up his Complaint, so he tried to retcon it in his brief.
But as Meta argues, there was no actionable removal of copyright management information (CMI) under the DMCA. Beaulier's own complaint describes that "removal" as an "inherent consequence" of AI training—not an intentional act. And that is fatal to the DMCA's scienter requirements.
And then there was the claim that Meta distributed the data to... Well, why should I give away the juicy parts?
And just wait 'til we get to the allegation that Meta says "pleads him out of court"!
I can't write satire this good!
Beaulier v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 3:26-cv-02632 https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73020880/beaulier-v-meta-platforms-inc/
Complaint – #1 in Beaulier v. Meta https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73020880/1/beaulier-v-meta-platforms-inc/
Dismiss – #21 in Beaulier v. Meta https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73020880/21/beaulier-v-meta-platforms-inc/
Opposition/Response to Motion – #29 in Beaulier v. Meta https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73020880/29/beaulier-v-meta-platforms-inc/
Reply to Opposition/Response – #30 in Beaulier v. Meta https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73020880/30/beaulier-v-meta-platforms-inc/
Reply to Opposition/Response – #29 in Beaulier v. NVIDIA https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73043521/29/beaulier-v-nvidia-corporation/
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
💬Bᴏɢᴏsɪᴛʏ Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: https://discord.bogosity.tv/
💬Lᴏʀᴅ Kɪʟʟɪᴀɴ’ꜱ Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: http://bit.ly/LK-Discord
▶️YᴏᴜTᴜʙᴇ: https://www.youtube.com/shanedk
▶️Oᴅʏsᴇᴇ: https://odysee.com/%24/invite/@shanedk:4
▶️Rᴜᴍʙʟᴇ https://rumble.com/c/shanedk
💬Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: http://bit.ly/LK-Discord
💰Dᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴜʙꜱᴄʀɪʙᴇ: https://donate.bogosity.tv
0:00 - Preview
1:03 - Intro
2:04 - The Case Is Solely About CMI
2:55 - AI Isn't Even Allowed to Use Creative Commons Assets
3:34 - The Language of His Own Complaint Defeats Him
4:54 - Meta's Motion to Dismiss
6:51 - Plaintiff Never Got Around to Actually Alleging Infringement
8:25 - Plaintiff Fails to Allege ANY of the Essential Facts
13:26 - Beaulier's Reply-Slash-Retcon
15:15 - Beaulier Says Meta "Distributed" the Works to Itself
17:19 - Using Other AI Cases as a Crutch
18:50 - Beaulier Argues—Wait...WHAT???
19:53 - THE MAIN EVENT: Meta's EPIC Reply Brief!
22:18 - Plaintiff's Own Complaint Debunks His Argument!
25:20 - Beaulier Tried to Backpedal, and Contradicted His Complaint
27:14 - Plaintiff Said Meta Was Hiding Its Infringement... from Meta???
28:41 - Distribution Has to Be to the Public, Not to Oneself
29:38 - Plaintiff Has Pleaded Himself out of Court!