Shane Killian

Bartz v. Anthropic has been going on for nearly TWO YEARS, we've been covering it from the start, and now it's finally over! Bringing one of the biggest AI copyright cases to a close after nearly two years.

But we have questions about the settlement:

Why did the judge approve it over all the objections? Can publishers still claim a big chunk of the money? Are the lawyers going to make a windfall in attorney's fees? Will Anthropic be facing other lawsuits from these same authors?

And what does this mean for AI, copyright, and fair use going forward?

This landmark case established one of the strongest fair use rulings in the AI era, but the legal battles over AI training data are far from over.

Order – #680 in Bartz v. Anthropic https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69058235/680/bartz-v-anthropic-pbc/

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 💬Bᴏɢᴏsɪᴛʏ Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: https://discord.bogosity.tv/ 💬Lᴏʀᴅ Kɪʟʟɪᴀɴ’ꜱ Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: http://bit.ly/LK-Discord ▶️YᴏᴜTᴜʙᴇ: https://www.youtube.com/shanedk ▶️Oᴅʏsᴇᴇ: https://odysee.com/%24/invite/@shanedk:4 ▶️Rᴜᴍʙʟᴇ https://rumble.com/c/shanedk 💬Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: http://bit.ly/LK-Discord 💰Dᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴜʙꜱᴄʀɪʙᴇ: https://donate.bogosity.tv

0:00 - Intro 2:07 - What Works Are and Are Not Covered 3:28 - How Much Publishers Get 5:31 - Why Authors Are Disadvantaged by the Process 7:32 - Do the Attorneys Get a Windfall? 12:20 - The Judgement