Description
Strike 3 claims that BitTorrent piracy by a former Meta employee is tied to Meta's AI training. Slight problem: the alleged torrenting happened months AFTER the employee stopped working for Meta.
In Strike 3 Holdings v. Meta, Strike 3 and Counterlife are attempting to link a separate John Doe copyright lawsuit to their AI case against Meta.
Meta's response highlights some serious problems with that theory.
Why should Meta be responsible for alleged torrenting conducted through a former employee's residential internet connection?
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
💬Bᴏɢᴏsɪᴛʏ Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: https://discord.bogosity.tv/
💬Lᴏʀᴅ Kɪʟʟɪᴀɴ’ꜱ Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: http://bit.ly/LK-Discord
▶️YᴏᴜTᴜʙᴇ: https://www.youtube.com/shanedk
▶️Oᴅʏsᴇᴇ: https://odysee.com/%24/invite/@shanedk:4
▶️Rᴜᴍʙʟᴇ https://rumble.com/c/shanedk
💬Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: http://bit.ly/LK-Discord
💰Dᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴜʙꜱᴄʀɪʙᴇ: https://donate.bogosity.tv
0:00 - Intro
0:55 - They Sued a John Doe IP Address
2:39 - Why Is a FORMER Employee Evidence of Wrongdoing by Meta?
3:30 - Doe Is No Different from Thousands of Other Cases
6:17 - How This Motion Is Self-Contradictory
6:58 - This Doesn't Even Identify the Employee
7:35 - They Have Nothing Linking the Conduct to Meta or Relating the Two Cases