Description
https://BibleCourts.com
Part 4B of Responding to Torahism: A Forensic Scriptural Defense answers Robert L. Solberg’s “permitted but not required” framework and argues that this language is not neutral when it removes covenant authority from Yah’s commandments.
This video asks a direct question:
If Yah commanded Sabbath, clean food, Passover, circumcision, holiness, and covenant obedience, can man downgrade those commandments into optional personal preference?
This section examines Solberg’s principle/expression framework, the moral/ceremonial division, Mark 7, Acts 10, Romans 14, 1 Timothy 4, Isaiah 66, temple sacrifices, Acts 21, the Great Commission, Sabbath, Passover, Easter, anti-Jewish divergence, and the claim that Torah obedience is “captivity.”
The issue is not whether Torah observant believers think Torah earns salvation. The issue is whether the saved disciples of Yeshua remain obligated to obey the commandments of Yah as covenant obedience after faith.
This video argues that:
• A Sabbath principle without the seventh-day Sabbath is not the Sabbath commandment.
• A clean-food principle without clean and unclean animals is not Leviticus 11.
• A Passover principle without Passover is not Passover.
• A circumcision principle without physical circumcision is not Genesis 17.
• A Torah principle detached from Torah commandments is not Torah.
The New Covenant does not erase Torah. Jeremiah 31 says Yah writes His law on the heart. Ezekiel 36 says the Spirit causes His people to walk in His statutes and keep His judgments. Romans 8 says the righteousness of the law is fulfilled in those who walk by the Spirit.
Start with the full playlist:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYcXN4at-gEMMQF49Kt-fnokleywCwFXa&si=-jmUn2c7v5Af-szZI
Recommended previous video:
Part 4A — Yeshua the Torah-Enforcing Judge
Chapters:
0:00 Solberg’s framework collapses
0:45 Principle without commandment is not Torah
1:18 Why “permitted but not required” is not neutral
1:40 Man’s permission is not the biblical question
1:55 Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hebrews, and Romans 8
2:35 Moral and ceremonial law: a false knife
3:29 The Bible does not divide Torah this way
4:07 Matthew 5 and the least commandments
4:38 James rejects selective obedience
5:06 Mark 7, Acts 10, Romans 14, and 1 Timothy 4
5:37 Mark 7 is about handwashing tradition
6:18 Acts 10 interprets itself
7:04 Ezekiel and the unclean-food comparison
8:30 Isaiah 66 and end-time judgment
8:56 Temple, priests, sacrifices, and worship
9:29 Not abolished versus not presently performable
10:45 Paul, Acts 21, vows, and temple purification
11:36 Post-resurrection silence is not abolition
12:22 The Great Commission does not erase Torah
12:37 Acts 15, Acts 21, Acts 24, and Acts 25
13:12 Divergence and anti-Jewish church history
14:26 Constantine, Easter, and separation from the Jewish calendar
15:00 Calendar is theological
15:25 Appointed times are not disposable
16:08 Curiosity to captivity framework answered
16:50 Reading the whole Bible is not captivity
17:03 Torah is not bondage
17:57 Torah is truth, light, and liberty
18:20 Sabbath, clean food, and Passover are repentance, not captivity
19:22 Torah observance is not Gnosticism
20:17 The real hidden-knowledge system
20:52 Yeshua’s deity is not an excuse to reject Torah
23:45 If Yeshua is God, He does not weaken Torah
24:16 Fringe denials do not discredit Torah obedience
28:15 Solberg’s real target is obedience after salvation
29:35 Grace forgives sin and empowers repentance
30:56 Closing summary: separations the Bible never authorizes
31:58 Torahlessness is captivity
32:32 “Permitted but not required” is theological downgrade
33:18 Philosophical deconstruction of principle and expression
33:51 The Hittite-law analogy problem
35:04 Sabbath and Passover as theological markers
#Torah #Yeshua #Torahism #RobertSolberg #HebrewRoots #LawOfMoses #PermittedButNotRequired #Pronomian #NewCovenant #Matthew5 #Acts10 #Mark7 #Romans14 #Isaiah66 #Sabbath #Passover #CleanFood #CommandmentsOfGod #FaithOfYeshua #BibleCourts